As Putin plays Russian roulette in Ukraine, Indian diplomacy treads a fine line
There is little doubt that India should, and will, continue to maintain its voting pattern, and abstain again when the matter is put to a vote in the UNGA in the next few days
Events in Ukraine are unfolding rapidly, making predictions riskier. The conflict has raised several issues with broader implications, including for India.
At the beginning of 2022, the five Permanent Members (P-5) of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) put out a joint statement inter alia affirming that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be fought. They underscored their intention to prevent unauthorised or unintended use of nuclear weapons. Even more importantly, they reaffirmed that “none of our nuclear weapons is targeted at each other or at any other State”. This may have been sheer rhetoric in order to set the tone for the 10th NPT Review Conference (RevCon). President Putin’s call for nuclear alert shreds that statement to bits.
Wrecked by a lack of consensus, the UNSC, through a procedural resolution, invoked a rarely convened special session of the UN General Assembly (UNGA). As the UNGA deliberates on the Ukraine crisis at the ongoing 11th Emergency Special Session, the focus is yet again on how India should react. India did right to abstain from voting in the UNSC, taking into account the need for stable relations with the Russian Federation and the utmost priority it attaches to Operation Ganga, aimed at securing the safe evacuation of the thousands of Indian students who remain stranded in war-torn Ukraine.
Sergiy Kyslytsya, Ukrainian Ambassador to the United Nations, addresses the UN Security Council meeting on the Russian invasion of Ukraine at UN headquarters. AP
India believes in humanity — Manavta — and the Modi government has done the right thing by offering humanitarian assistance to the people of Ukraine in accordance with its ancient ethos. The Indian Air Force planes used to deliver aid to Ukraine should be used to bring back the stranded students directly from within Ukraine, in addition to our civilian aircraft picking up those who have managed to cross over to neighbouring countries. This will ensure speedier and en masse evacuation. In India, one expects the nation to unite to support the government in dealing with such a herculean task.
There is little doubt that India should, and will, continue to maintain its voting pattern, and abstain again when the matter is put to a vote in the UNGA in the next few days. India’s consistent voting pattern is expected to be backed by an equally consistent explanation of vote (EOV) emphasising the need to cease hostilities, resume the path of dialogue and diplomacy, expressing concern at the humanitarian crisis and underscore the safety and security of its nationals.
Developments in Ukraine are a throwback, of sorts, to Pakistan’s invasion of the state of Jammu and Kashmir in 1947 and the latter’s de facto division in which major powers played a key role, the fact of its accession to India notwithstanding. India does not endorse the military occupation of a sovereign state or recognize the independence of Ukraine’s breakaway provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk. For that matter, India has never accepted the illegality of the creation of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir or, for that matter, of Kashmir’s territory being ceded by Pakistan to China. Such logic perhaps informs India’s statements in the UNSC, which underscore respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
One cannot see India, which is loath to countenance any UN intervention or involvement, whether through the UNSC or the UNGA, in matters pertaining to its own sovereignty and territorial integrity, taking a different position. Besides, a UNGA resolution is recommendatory and not binding in nature.
The ten emergency special sessions of the UNGA held so far under the provisions of the UNGA’s “Uniting For Peace” resolution of 1950 have addressed intractable issues since the 1950s. The USSR’s invasions of Hungary and Afghanistan figure prominently, as do the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, East Jerusalem, Golan Heights, Lebanon, Congo and the Suez Crisis and the invasion of Egypt by Israel, followed by the UK and France. Many issues lingered on for years, and some still do, regardless of the sentiments expressed in the UNGA.
Even as fighting rages and EU members step up military and other assistance to Ukraine, the latter has appealed for an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of Russian troops. Mindful of biting sanctions and the downward spiral of the rouble, Russia also appears keen to keep the door open for a negotiated settlement. Ukraine, meanwhile, has hurriedly applied for EU membership banking on a fast-track process.
***
Also Read
Ghosespot | How Opposition slamming Modi government’s handling of crisis doesn’t hold water
Russia’s war in Ukraine: How India’s UN Security Council vote was pragmatic
Russia-Ukraine crisis: Here’s what will get more expensive in India if two countries go to war
The meta-narrative about India’s non-involvement in the Ukraine imbroglio
India’s abstinence from UN Security Council vote on Ukraine was the right decision
Ukraine crisis sinks Indian markets, set to hit bilateral trade with Kyiv
How Ukraine crisis marks return of Russia as a global geopolitical player
Vladimir Putin plays Ukraine card well, but will the West bend and accept his demands?
Why does Russia want Ukraine so badly? Here’s what a geography book tells us
Ukraine crisis: Taking sides will harm India’s national interests
Ukraine should realise the folly of NATO tilt and resume talks with Putin’s Russia
Vladimir Putin draws redline for NATO: No eastward expansion towards Ukraine
How Vladimir Putin’s Ukraine stunt stuns Germany and disrupts its economic dreams
Why vested interests are hell-bent on dragging India into a distant conflict in Ukraine
***
The imposition of wide-ranging and unprecedented sanctions against Russia by the US, UK and the EU, including withdrawal of SWIFT facilities for Russian banking institutions, will force Russia to turn to friendly nations. This could open up some opportunities for India and Russia to engage in rupee barter trade, although the slump in the value of the Russian rouble will prove problematic in settlements.
It would be rather short-sighted on the US’ part if it were to impose sanctions on India under CAATSA (Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act) on account of the S-400 missile defence system deal with Russia. It is in the US’ interest to support a robust Indian capability against Chinese belligerence in the Indo-Pacific. It is also unreasonable to expect that India would effect a turnaround and source all defence hardware from the US.
India’s reliance on Russian defence hardware, though much less than in the past, is still overwhelming. Apart from the jointly produced BrahMos cruise missiles recently contracted for export to the Philippines, India would have to review the indigenous production of the AK-203 assault rifle, the fresh leasing of an “Akula” nuclear-powered attack submarine as well as future production of Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter aircraft and T-90MS main battle tanks. There is little doubt that both India and Russia will seek to do their utmost to respect all agreements though there could be inevitable delays.
IAF Sukhoi Su-30MKI fighter jets
The ongoing crisis in Ukraine has implications for India’s defence cooperation with that country, especially the upgrading of its aging Antonov (AN-32) military transport fleet. Perhaps the trickiest one could be the project with Russia involving four Admiral Grigorovich frigates, to be powered by Ukraine’s Zorya-Mashproekt M7N1E gas turbines. Apart from two frigates to be built at the Goa Shipyard Limited (GSL), another two are to be built at Russia’s Yantar Shipyard. This requires some deft coordination. There are bound to be delays, given the rift between Russia and Ukraine and the sanctions regime. Likewise, a question-mark hovers on whether the Vympel R-27 air-to-air missile for India’s Su-30 MKI fighters can be sourced from Ukraine.
The war in Ukraine has thrown energy markets in turmoil, with crude oil around the $100 mark, registering the highest such spike since 2014. Though consumers in India have not yet felt the pinch, the turbulence in energy prices could have an upward spiralling effect on inflation in the Indian economy. The Indian government will have to be mindful of the potential impact on popular sentiment at a time when efforts are underway to revive economic growth after the deleterious impact of the pandemic.
The volatility in global energy prices further highlights the pressing need for India to make the transition towards renewables, particularly green hydrogen. Since energy imports from Saudi Arabia and the US will inevitably prove more expensive, India could consider resuming imports from Iran. China, for instance, never ceased such imports despite US sanctions. Perhaps trade through third countries or some form of rupee barter trade could be explored.
The Ukraine crisis is expected to simmer for a long time even if the belligerents agree on a ceasefire. India will have to grapple with contradictions in the coming months in the context of the BRICS Summit in China and the G20 Summit in Indonesia. In both, Indian diplomacy will be put to the test in steering clear of ideology and rhetoric to secure our national interests.
The author is the Director General of the Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses. Views expressed are personal.
Read all the Latest News, Trending News, Cricket News, Bollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
