RS adjourned four times amid uproar over bill on raising FDI in insurance
The Congress and other Opposition parties Thursday forced adjournments of Rajya Sabha proceedings for four times during the post-lunch sitting as they insisted on referring to a standing committee a bill on raising the FDI in the insurance sector to 74 per cent from the current 49 per cent.
After Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman moved the Insurance (Amendment) Bill 2021 for passing in the Upper House, Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge said it will put the people of country in trouble.
He said the Insurance Act 1938 is being amended for the third time under the BJP.
The Act was first amended during Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s tenure when 26 per cent FDI was allowed in the insurance sector, he said, adding later in 2015, the law was amended further to allow 49 per cent FDI and now the amendment is for allowing 74 per cent FDI.
“I want the bill scrutinised to address the gaps and it should be referred to a standing committee,” the Congress leader said as his party colleagues rose in support of the demand and began shouting slogans.
Amid sloganeering, BJP leader Bhupender Yadav said Kharge’s statement was “factually incorrect”.
Firstly, the Opposition has not given a motion to refer the bill to a select committee under Rule 71 and 72, he said.
Secondly, he added, this is the only bill which has been examined by a standing committee, the Law Commission and the Narasimhan Commission and even a select committee of the Upper House.
“The bill has been brought after full scrutiny,” he said, and added that the Congress had also brought a similar bill in 2008 and, thereafter, it was sent to a standing committee.
Neither the motion nor the point of order raised by Opposition is correct, he added.
As Opposition members trooped into the Well of the House raising slogans, Deputy Chairman Harivansh told them that amendments to refer the bill to a select committee has not been given.
“You did not give any amendments to refer the bill to a select committee. You had time. The House will decide now,” he said, asking the protesting members to go back to their seats and allow the discussion to take place as the motion had been moved.
DMK leader Tiruchi Siva said, “Had the bill been passed in the Lok Sabha, we could have given an amendment to refer it to a select committee. The bill has been introduced in our House, so it could be referred to a standing committee. The bill needs to be scrutinised.”
As the uproar continued, the Deputy Chair first adjourned the House for 10 minutes. When it reassembled, the House was again adjourned for 17 minutes and later for 15 minutes before the discussion began at 3.15 pm amid commotion.
As discussion started, the House was adjourned again for the fourth time till 3.39 pm amid uproar.
Just before the bill was moved for passage in the Upper House, the Deputy Chairman said Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil’s letter raising a point of order opposing the introduction of insurance amendment bill 2021 was not admitted, saying the member quoted a wrong rule.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Dear Reader,
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.
Digital Editor
