‘Twitter denied access to my account for almost an hour’: IT Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad- Technology News, Firstpost
tech2 News StaffJun 25, 2021 18:56:16 IST
Amid a public spat between Twitter India and the Government of India, Union Minister for Electronics and Information Technology Ravi Shankar Prasad said that he was denied access to his Twitter account for almost an hour on Friday.
Prasad wrote in a tweet that his account was blocked on the “alleged ground that there was a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of the USA”. Prasad was subsequently allowed access to the account.
Friends! Something highly peculiar happened today. Twitter denied access to my account for almost an hour on the alleged ground that there was a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of the USA and subsequently they allowed me to access the account. pic.twitter.com/WspPmor9Su
— Ravi Shankar Prasad (@rsprasad) June 25, 2021
This latest run-in with the micro-blogging site comes in the backdrop of a months-long clash with the BJP-led Centre, from requests to take down tweets supporting the farmers’ agitation to a more recent spat over new IT rules.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) criminalises the production and dissemination of devices, services and/or technology, intended to circumvent measures that control access to copyrighted works. It can be invoked to flag the use of someone’s content being used without their consent.
It is apparent that my statements calling out the high handedness and arbitrary actions of Twitter, particularly sharing the clips of my interviews to TV channels and its powerful impact, have clearly ruffled its feathers.
— Ravi Shankar Prasad (@rsprasad) June 25, 2021
The Union minister said that by blocking his account without prior notice, Twitter violated Rule 4(8) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules 2021.
Currently, it’s unclear as to which post by Prasad led to his account being disabled. However, the IT minister claims that his statements “calling out the high-handedness and arbitrary actions of Twitter, particularly sharing the clips of my interviews to TV channels and its powerful impact, have clearly ruffled its feathers.”
Furthermore, in the past several years, no television channel or any anchor has made any complaints about copyright infringements with regard to these news clips of my interviews shared on social media.
— Ravi Shankar Prasad (@rsprasad) June 25, 2021
Prasad ended the tweet thread with a warning for Twitter, which read, “No matter what any platform does they will have to abide by the new IT Rules fully and there shall be no compromise on that.”
No matter what any platform does they will have to abide by the new IT Rules fully and there shall be no compromise on that.
— Ravi Shankar Prasad (@rsprasad) June 25, 2021
A little after 4 pm, Congress leader Shashi Tharoor tweeted to say he too faced a similar issue, with a tweet of his featuring a popular song being deleted because of a copyright claim.
Raviji, the same thing just happened to me. Clearly DMCA is getting hyperactive. This tweet has been deleted by @Twitter because its video includes the copyrighted BoneyM song”Rasputin”: https://t.co/ClgP2OKV1o #DanceIsNotJihad pic.twitter.com/IqQD50WhaU
After process, a/c unlocked. https://t.co/TCeT8aGxV6— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) June 25, 2021
Among a series of tweets, Tharoor mentioned the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology will be reaching out to Twitter India to seek clarity on why him and Prasad were locked out of their accounts, and on the rules and procedures it follow for its India operations.
As Chairman of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Information Technology, I can state that we will be seeking an explanation from @TwitterIndia for the locking of @rsprasad‘s & my accounts & the rules & procedures they follow while operating in India.
— Shashi Tharoor (@ShashiTharoor) June 25, 2021
Meanwhile, Aprameya Radhakrishna, CEO and co-founder at Koo issued a statement regarding this, saying, “Giving a user complete context of any claimed violation and an intimation of the exact violation is important. The user should also be able to contest or accept the claimed violation. A direct action of suspension without the above makes it seem like a social media platform is taking the final judgement call and is not being an intermediary.”
